🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising number of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a law increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful starting point," commented a leading MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the local level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures mandating guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global discussion continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.